Translate

September 07, 2014

UK Looks Into the Implementation of Sino-British Joint Declaration


When Hong Kong people resist the denial of genuine 
universal suffrage in Hong Kong, the international community 
also voices their concern. 

Britain and China initiate a series of diplomatic firings at each 
other. 

Britain launched an investigation into Hong Kong,s democratic 
progress, and China requested a stop to the investigation. 

Britain's parliament rejected China's call and warned 
the Communist regime: the political reform in Hong Kong 
could violate the 1984 Sino-UK Joint Declaration.

This year marks the 30th anniversary of the signing 
of the Joint Declaration. 

With the exacerbated volatility in Hong Kong,
The UK parliament examined how China and Britain's joint 
declaration on the transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong 
to China is being implemented.

Beijing immediately expressed strong dissatisfaction and 
opposition. 

Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang stated China,s 
opposition to any foreign interference in internal affairs 
at a regular press briefing on the 2nd.

The Foreign Affairs Committee of the National People's 
Congress (NPC) of China had sent a letter to its British 
counterpart, condemning its probe into the state of democracy 
since Hong Kong was handed back to Chinese sovereignty 
in 1997, quoted Reuters. 

Communist Ambassador to the UK Liu Xiaoming 
also stressed China,s stance to the British side.

But Richard Ottaway, chairman of the British parliament's 
Foreign Affairs Committee, said on Tuesday that members 
of parliament would not heed the Chinese calls, reported Reuters.

The regime was also warned that reforms there may violate 
a 1984 deal on the former British colony's sovereignty.

Reuters added, a spokesman for Cameron said the work 
of parliament's select committees was "rightly and 
appropriately entirely independent".

Bao Tong, secretary of former Communist Party General 
Secretary Zhao Ziyang, points out that the British Parliament,s 
inquiry into Hong Kong democracy development means 
to fulfill its promises. 

It is nothing about interference in internal affairs 
as claimed by the Communist Party. 

Bao Tong: "What exactly does 'Hong Kong people running 
Hong Kong', mean, if even the election is determined 
by the National People's Congress Standing Committee, 
the Central? 

It is absurd that Hong Kong people can not rule Hong Kong 
or speak of elections, even election approach is decided 
by the central."

Bao Tong said that Hong Kong voters have become pawns 
on the chessboard for the CCP. 

The commitment during the handover of Hong Kong 
regarding Hong Kong people ruling Hong Kong 
has been betrayed. 

According to the Sino-British Joint Declaration signed in 1984, 
Hong Kong was handed over to China in 1997. 

Hong Kong will enjoy a high degree of autonomy, i.e., 
the "one country two systems", "Hong Kong people running 
Hong Kong", for 50 years. 

Well-known political commentator Chen Pokong: 
"Today the British Parliament,s inquiry into the Sino-UK 
agreement for any drawbacks and the implementation 
on the progress in Hong Kong is an entirely responsive 
act of Britain's government. 

I believe it shows Britain,s obligation to Hong Kong, 
to the international community, and to China."

Chris Patten, the former governor of Hong Kong, writing 
in the Financial Times, condemned China,s planned reforms 
in Hong Kong that would introduce the kind of stage-managed 
democracy seen in Iran. 

He also called into question Britain,s “sense of honour” 
and criticized David Cameron,s government for failing 
to condemn China,s planned reforms in Hong Kong.

The Communist media Global Times has criticized Patten 
for two consecutive days, regarding his article. 

But, when Chinese officials criticize the British MPs 
and others for commenting on the situation in 
Hong Kong, they ignore the fact: the UK has obligations 
under its joint declaration with China to guarantee the territory,s 
way of life for 50 years, wrote Lord Patten.

“Sooner or later I assume the British government will comment 
on Beijing,s plan,” Lord Patten writes. “This would not be 
a provocation but a duty. No one can seriously believe that 
this would have commercial consequences, or that such 
consequences should be an overriding concern 
when our honour is on the line.”

Financial Times (FT) reported, Nick Clegg, the UK deputy 
prime minister, has also criticised what he claims 
is Conservative silence on Hong Kong. 

Downing St said it would “look very carefully” at the 
Chinese proposals but added it backed the transition to 
universal suffrage in Hong Kong, added FT.

Interview & Edit/LiYun Post-Production/Li Zhiyuan
http://m.ntdtv.com/xtr/mb5/2014/09/05/a1135922.html